Montana Maven's
        Opinions Worth Ropin'
     

Rancor in the Ranks: Rebellion from the Montana Democratic Central Committees

Print the article

This entry was posted on 8/23/2009 2:42 PM and is filed under Montana,health care,Politics.

 
It has been one week since 8 Montana Democratic CentralCommittees delivered their  resolutions for single payer or a strong public option in a health care bill to President Obama and Senator Baucus at the Belgrade Town Hall Meeting in Montana on August 14.   More central committees were holding meetings to vote on their own resolutions and the countis now at 18. (Out of our 56 counties in Montana, 11 counties do not have a central committee and 10 are pretty much non-functional, so these 18 represent a whole lot of activists).  Many chairs of the committees, like myself,had been frustrated much like our founding brothers because "our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury and neglect". Yes we had all received the same form letter from the Baucus office even when we asked very specific questions.  So we began to look for other ways to get Max's attention.  The letters to the President did the trick.  On Monday, August 17, three days after the town meeting, the Chairs of the Central Committees were asked to a conference call with Senator Baucus. No one could remember anything like this every happening before.
 

The meeting was pretty raucous.  Max came on to urge party unity, but county chairs, like myself, demanded substance for our support.  Time and time again we reminded the Senator that basically "when in the course of human events it becomes necessary for people to reform health care bonds,"  principle and people must take precedence over process and politics.  While Max emphasized Medicare costs or doctors' costs that must be reined in, most chairs pointed to insurance company overhead as the culprit.While Max emphasized the needed 60 votes that had to include Republicans, we asked him to abandon that idea.

After the call, it became clear to many Central Committees that in order to fulfill our obligations to our precinct members and for the greater good of all the people in our counties, we must unify for real health care reform and hold our Senator accountable.  A coalition was formed and a press release went out today.

An Alliance of Montana County Democratic Central Committees

August 23, 2009

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


FOLLOWING RANCOR AMONG THE RANKS,
BAUCUS ASSURES MONTANA CONSTITUENTS:
"I WANT A PUBLIC OPTION TOO"


U.S. Senator Max Baucus has finally broken his silence regarding his personal position
on including a public option in health care reform legislation. Last Monday night (8/17),
in an unprecedented conference call to Montana Democratic central committee chairs,
the powerful leader of the Senate Finance Committee told his strongest supporters that
he supported a public option. While discussing the obstacles to getting a public option
through the Senate, he assured his forty listeners, "I want a public option too!" The
conference call was groundbreaking in that none of the recipients could ever remember
this kind of call ever happening before. The teleconference was set up seemingly in
reaction to rising discontent among the local Democratic leaders with the Senator's
failure to take a clear position on the issue.
The discussion, which became contentious and rancorous at times, also touched upon
the wisdom of creating insurance cooperatives as an alternative to a public option.

When several of the county chairs objected, commenting that they did not trust the
health insurance companies to police themselves and limit their outrageous corporate
profits, Baucus commented, "Neither do I."

In the aftermath of the teleconference, a coalition of eighteen Montana counties in the
Senator's home state decided to move forward with their plan to issue a Unified
Statement accompanied by a joint press release. The statement sends a loud and clear
message to their Senator: Any health care reform package coming out of his Senate
Finance Committee must contain, at a minimum, a provision for a strong public option.
The action is a show of unity not previously seen in Montana political history. The
statement asserts, "Here in Montana, the need for real health care reform could not be
greater. Families, small business, and small ranches and farms are suffering and
being crushed by the rising cost of health care. Thousands of Montanans are
uninsured, and many more are losing their homes, businesses and ranches due to
exorbitant medical bills."

Calling themselves the Coalition of the United Montana Democratic Central
Committees, the group's statement announces it has "established a position in support
of a strong public option as an essential element in health care reform." In specifying the
necessary components needed for such a public option, they list:

• National Coverage
• Availability to all Americans
• Portability, which includes maintaining coverage even if one loses his or her job
• No exclusions for preexisting conditions, denial of coverage if one gets ill, or
develops catastrophic costs
• Publicly run and administered with full transparency and accountability to
congress
• No triggers
Christina Quijano, a Billings physician, is Chair of the Carbon County Democratic
Central Committee. Carbon County is located in south-central Montana not far from
Yellowstone National Park. Speaking for the Coalition, she pointed out, "For this
number of counties from all across Montana to join together sends a strong signal to our
representatives in Washington that their constituents here in Big Sky Country are unified
and stand firm in their insistence that a public option be included in any health care
reform bill." Senator Jon Tester (D-Mont) has said he would not vote against a public
option, while Montana’s sole US representative, Denny Rehberg (R-Mont) remains
opposed to such a measure. Max Baucus, Chair of the Senate Finance Committee, has
emerged as a key player in the ongoing health care reform deliberations and, until now,
has remained quiet about his personal view. In the final portion of the Coalition's
Unified Statement, Quijano emphasizes Senator Baucus’ significant role in this piece of
legislation: "We are counting on Senator Baucus to use his influence and leadership to
create the most meaningful legacy of our times, real health care reform. 'Max,
Montana's Senator', please don't let Montana down!"

Among the other counties in the Coalition is Missoula County, where Baucus got his
start in politics as a State Representative. Also joining Carbon and Missoula Counties in
adopting the Unified Statement are Beaverhead County, Dawson County, Fergus
County, Golden Valley County, Hill County, Jefferson County, Lake County, Madison
County, Meagher County, Ravalli County, Richland County, Roosevelt County,
Rosebud County, Sheridan County, Sweet Grass County, and Teton County.

_____________________

The unity action coming from the actual grass roots instead of the state party bosses has not been seen in anyone's recent memory. Party politics was centered around county central committees serving as foot soldiers for whoever was running for public office.  They were doorknockers and phone callers.  They gave spaghetti dinners and bingo nights.  They went to conventions and wore funny hats.  But a realsay in what being a Democrat in Montana meant and what policies would be advanced was crafted from above.

But something started to stir after 2000 in the hearts of many democrats herein Montana.   In 2004 they joined the campaigns of Dean, Kucinich, and Edwards who all seemed to be in rebellion to the status quo.    After electing Brian Schweitzer  who ran on a populist message many newcomers stayed and joined the old Democratic central committees.  My county never had a central committee so we formed one.  Two years later we elected Jon Tester.   Two years after that we did pretty darn well for Barack Obama.

This year all this new energy plus some of the old fighting populist spirit of the People's Party of over a hundred years ago began to coalesce around the civil rights issue of health care.  And it seems that Max was unprepared for the rebellion that occurred in the central committees.  Hence, the conference call.

The "Unified Statement of the Coalition of United Montana Democratic Central Committees on Health Care Reform" follows here:

An Alliance of Montana County Democratic Central Committees
UNIFIED STATEMENT
OF THE
COALITION OF UNITED MONTANA DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEES
ON
HEALTH CARE REFORM
Across this vast and diverse country, Americans agree that we are in a severe health care
crisis. Our nation’s economy, security, stability, sustainability, and ability to lead into the
future are undeniably dependent on fixing our inefficient and high priced health care
system.
For the first time in the sixty year history of this dysfunctional system, we have the
potential to move forward with meaningful reform. The need for real health care reform
could not be more urgent. We cannot afford to wait.
Here in Montana, the need for real health care reform could not be greater. Families,
small business, and small ranches and farms are suffering and being crushed by the rising
cost of health care. Thousands of Montanans are uninsured, and many more are losing their
homes, business and ranches due to exorbitant medical bills.
Montanans from all walks of life, and all corners of this great state are making their
voices heard. What is being shouted loud and clear is that Montanans NEED health care
reform and they need it NOW.
We, as officers of Montana's Democratic Central Committees have heard the cries and
pleas of constituents in our counties. We have listened to the nightmares and horror
stories. In doing so we have been moved to passionately take on this crucial cause. Over
the past few months many of the central committees have discussed and researched this
issue. Many central committees have established unanimous resolutions, or positions on
health care reform. Countless central committees and individuals have written letters and
made phone calls to our representatives, particularly our senior senator, Max Baucus, who
holds a key position as chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.
In order to collectively express our strong desire and demand for real heath care reform,
we have formed the Coalition of United Montana Democratic Central Committees. Our
goal is to use one clear voice, that hopefully will ring louder than the special interests, to let
our representatives know what we expect and demand from them.

We the Coalition of the United Montana Democratic Central Committees have
established a position in support of a strong public option as part of any health care
reform. The broader goal of a strong public option is to provide a high•quality, affordable
insurance option to all Americans, and provide a means of cost containment. Although
many central committees initially preferred a single payer plan, we all concluded that a
strong public option was a feasible compromise that could meet these goals and provide
Americans with a choice. In order to achieve these goals, a strong public option must
contain the following core concepts:
• National Coverage
• Available to all Americans
• Portability, which includes maintaining coverage even if one loses his or her job
• No exclusions for preexisting conditions, denial of coverage if one gets ill, or
develops catastrophic costs
• Publicly run and administered with full transparency and accountability to congress
• Emphasis on prevention, and primary care, and a reduction in administrative costs
• No triggers
By unifying our position, and our voices we hope to let the public, the media, and our
representatives know where we solidly stand on this critical issue. We would like to
encourage Senator Tester, and Representative Rehberg to support a strong public option,
and private insurance reform, and to assure them that our Coalition is firmly behind them.
While we await the Senate Finance Committee’s bill, we urge Senator Baucus to listen to his
constituents, and the unified voice of his central committees, and support a strong public
option, and private insurance reform. Senator Baucus has done so many great things for the
State of Montana. We are counting on him to use his influence and leadership to create the
most meaningful legacy of our times, real heath care reform. “Max, Montana’s Senator”,
please don’t let Montana down!



 del.icio.us  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
    Page: 1 of 1
    • 8/23/2009 3:00 PM William Crain wrote:
      Where can i find which Cntl Cmmt's are in the mix? i would be hard pressed to find YS cnty dems in it? but i want to be sure before i put in my 2 cents.
      Reply to this
      1. 8/23/2009 4:11 PM Richard wrote:
        I see that missing from the list of participating cc's are Yellowstone, Cascade, Flat Head, and whatever county Helena is in. And did I see Gallatin?

        Silver Bow, I know, voted for only single-payer.

        What's up with the big counties? Are they all blue dogs?
        Reply to this
        1. 8/23/2009 4:31 PM Montana Maven wrote:
          Silver Bow passed a single payer resolution.  So maybe they just didn't like the "unified" idea.  I don't know.  Probably the Carbon County Dems know why.  I think we should start asking.

          Reply to this
    • 8/23/2009 9:37 PM Cujo359 wrote:
      It's wonderful that Montana Democrats have gotten together to do this. I don't know the first thing about Montana's politics, but typically getting eighteen groups of Democrats to agree on anything that isn't blatantly obvious is an accomplishment.
      Reply to this
    • 8/23/2009 10:11 PM Jake Terpstra wrote:
      Excellent. but don't let up now, since you have his attention.
      Reply to this
    • 8/23/2009 10:15 PM Jake Terpstra wrote:
      Excallent. now keep the pressure up, since you apparently have his attention.
      Reply to this
    • 8/24/2009 5:10 AM cbl wrote:
      thank you Montana !!!

      the idea someone as entrenched as Sen Baucus is feeling unprecedented, unanticipated pressure like this is making me smile -

      keep it up, up,up !

      mad progressive thanks

      looko out North Dakota, this looks viral!
      Reply to this
    • 8/24/2009 7:06 AM Bob Balhiser wrote:
      As an ex-republican who supported Obama with my money and my vote I kept wondering why he and the Democratic party machine didn't capitalize on this perfect opportunity to buck the medical industrial complex lobbyists and support HR 676.

      As a fiscal conservative, I see Medicare-for-All (HR 676) is a way to reign in the costs of health care by eliminating insurance profiteering and obscene administrative costs then redirect the savings toward actual health care. In this way we could provide basic health care to all American citizens without adding one dime to our total health care spending.

      I am glad to see a bit of grassroots backbone from the democrats, because they were about to lose Independent voters like me who expected Obama to buck the syatem and create real, meaningful change---not promote the same tired old stuff Baucus has been pushing.

      Remember, Democrats, you need Independent votes to preserve a working majority in the upcoming elections ---don't take us for granted and just expect us to toe the party line.
      Reply to this
      1. 8/26/2009 3:08 AM Kathryn Neall wrote:
        And don't take for granted that left progressives will toe the party line either. And from NJ here's a big, giant hug to everyone in Montana supporting reform. Thanks for showing the way.
        :::::wondering if there are central comms in NJ::::
        Reply to this
        1. 8/26/2009 7:00 AM Montana Maven wrote:
          Find your local precinct and start changing the tone.  Central Committees are formed from precincts and precinct captains are still the people who vote officers in or out.  Instead of taking direction from Baucus and Schweitzer as is normally done, we told them what we want.  Jane and Firedog Lake are pressuring them in Washington.  Precincts must pressure them from home.

          Reply to this
    • 8/24/2009 9:36 AM Doublewidetx wrote:
      Wow! I wish we had your perspective and organizational skills here in Texas. Y'all make me want to move to Montana soon with my zircon-encrusted tweezers. Well done!
      Reply to this
    • 8/24/2009 10:01 AM Terry Harrington wrote:
      We in Butte-Silver Bow did endorse a Single-payer resolution. It was our agreement that we must endorse what we believe would be the best system. The national dems started out compromising with a public option and have negotiated it down to water and could end up being omitted from the bill all together. I, for one, was under the impression that the resolution we singed on to was the same that the other central committees were using. That is the way it was presented. A strong public option without mandates will sit well with me and I am sure most of the other dems in Butte. But the line must be drawn there.
      Reply to this
      1. 8/24/2009 10:40 AM Montana Maven wrote:
        Sweet Grass also endorsed Medicare for All.  I talked to Ken in Carbon County who is also a strong single payer that the "available to all Americans" and "no trigger" aka health care for all NOW is what this resolution calls for.  So I was comfortable signing on.  We are not for some crap bill that mandates that the uninsured have to buy lousy expensive insurance policies. 

        I think the Carbon County Dems have given hope to many Democrats if you read some of the comments on dailykos.com which has front paged this story.  Baucus, Reid, and the Public Option

        Here's a comment:

        Thank you, Montana! (4+ / 0-)

        The Democrats in small states (population) have more power than they know, IMHO.  Montana Democrats have shown that they stand with us by holding their senator accountable.  I can't tell you how much this encourages me, one of those loathed "coastal elites" who is, though you might not know it, pulling for you.  

        Don't give away your power, small state Democrats.  Hold your senators accountable.  Follow Montana's lead.  Make them do it!

        I know it isn't easy.  You've got your rabid conservatives embedded in power positions.  We've got similar problems here with notoriously corrupt Democrats who sell us out to.  It can seem like it's impossible to influence or unseat them.  Just ask me, I'm from New Jersey.

        I wouldn't trust Baucus as far as I could throw him.  I'm still waiting for some kabuki public option theatre and the great convincing that chicken shit is chicken salad, with a large side of "we don't have the votes" at times.  But I do trust pressure and accountability and sunshine.  And I trust the FDR concept of "making them do it".




        Reply to this
    • 8/25/2009 1:40 PM Susan Nowak MD wrote:
      I think you guys are great! You went above his head, thereby forcing him to respond. You then presented an organized, well thought out agenda with specific demands. Best yet, after the call you issued a press release that put him on record as taking your position! I am in awe. One more comment. I really like your necessary components for a public option but I fear that any public option will fail. We are in major financial difficulties. Medicare & medicaid are so under funded that no one can afford to treat medicaid patients anymore and increasingly fewer docs can afford to accept medicare. The only affordable option is single payer because it cuts out all of the overhead coast. Of course, in order to realize the benefit, everyone must be covered. But I don't think the insurance industry is willing to go quietly. In fact I believe they are responsible for spreading a lot of misinformation, as well as preventing single payer reps from participating in the current debates on the issues. Anyway, keep up the good work. Consider HR 676.
      Reply to this
      1. 8/25/2009 2:27 PM Montana Maven wrote:
        Thanks for the encouragement.  Quite a few of the counties actually passed a Improved Medicare for All (HB 676) resolution.  Some of those were given to the President's staff in Bozeman at the Town Hall.  Several counties did not sign on with this resolution because it used "public option" language.  My county did pass a Medicare for All resolution, but I felt we could participate in the Coalition because of its plan to go public.  I liked the fighting spirit and playing offense instead of cowering in the corner.

        Our governor gave a rousing endorsement of the Canadian system right before the President spoke and threw the public option under the bus.  Watch it here. Schweitzer Touts Canadian Health Care


        Reply to this

    Page: 1 of 1
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name (required)

     Email (will not be published) (required)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.



      

    Copyright . http://MONTANAMAVEN.COM. All rights reserved.