Montana Maven's
        Opinions Worth Ropin'
     

Mythbusting Health Care - Part One

Print the article

This entry was posted on 1/23/2007 12:06 PM and is filed under Healthcare.

Myth Busting Health Care, Part One:  Universal Single Payer Healthcare Explored.
Which developed country is the ONLY one that does not have some form of healthcare for all its citizens?  You got it, the United States.   Canada, Britain, Germany, Japan, Finland, Switzerland, Taiwan, etc…etc…all have different forms of universal heathcare, but all citizens are covered.  That’s what’s known as Universal Healthcare.  We  have 46 million  of our citizens uninsured.  This number continues to grow as average families are priced out of insurance.  Insurance in populous states runs $15,000-$20,000 a year for a family of four.

Which country spends more per person for healthcare on average ($6,280) than the average of any other developed country ($2,307)? Ta Da!  It’s the United States while being 28th in life expectancy. Which country’s citizens pay 30 billion a year to the pharmaceutical companies for research and development and end up with the highest prices for drugs that they paid for? You guessed it.  And who gets to keep the patent on the drugs?  Not the citizens.  What a scam!

So what is meant by single payer healthcare? Single payer is just that, a payment system.
You can go to your own doctors and your own hospitals that are privately and, ideally, non-profit, but there is only one entity that pays the bills, the government. It’s like Germany has.  No, it’s not socialized medicine like the insurance companies would have you think.  That’s where the government owns the hospitals and pays the doctors like in Britain.  We have socialized (public) medicine here too.  It’s called the Veteran’s Administration.  We also have an example of a single payer system.  It’s called Medicare with an overhead of 2% compared to private insurers who had an average overhead of 15% and as high as 25%.  What you’re paying for is fancy boardrooms, expensive CEO’s salaries (the head of United Health received a 1.78 billion salary and bonus last year), vacations for their executives, a whole lot of advertising and giving bonuses to employees for denying you treatments. 

I can hear some of you say, “I don’t want a bureaucrat handling my insurance”.  But who would
you rather have handle your insurance claims; a bureaucrat in government  who needs to make his boss look good to the voters or a bureaucrat in a for-profit private insurance company whose primary function is to deny you your benefits to make a profit for his boss?

Health care is a right, not a privilege for the wealthy. It shouldn’t be “a Cadillac plan for the wealthy and mopeds for the rest of us.”  Employer based insurance was a U.S. invention and it’s time has passed.  It doesn’t make much sense anymore.  Workers need portable insurance.  They shouldn’t work in jobs just for the insurance and companies shouldn’t hire workers based on whether they are potential health risks or not.  What’s the sense of being an American if we don’t have the basic right of health that other developed nations have?  This is just common sense and our elected representatives must make it a moral imperative.

Medical bills cause over half of the bankruptcies in the U.S. These were middle class families that had so-called insurance when their health problems started.  Some will say we can’t afford it? Don’t believe them. Taiwan switched from our system to Canada’s and they had no increase in spending.  We can’t afford not to.







 





 del.icio.us  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
    Page: 1 of 1
    • 1/24/2007 9:59 AM DBunn wrote:
      Maven—

      I take it that this blog post is your draft for a LTE (I followed the link over from dKos). My comments:

      • It’s passionate and filled with facts. Both good things!
      • Maybe you could clean up the style a little bit. “While Canada, Britain, Germany, Japan, Finland, Switzerland, Taiwan, etc…etc…all have different ways of dealing with the way healthcare is administered, but all citizens are covered. That’s what’s known as Universal Healthcare…” could become something like “Canada, Britain, Germany, Japan, Finland, Switzerland, Taiwan, etc…etc…all have different forms of universal healthcare and are able to cover all their citizens.”
      • Excellent that you distinguish between government-administered insurance (which is the plan we’re backing) and socialized medicine (which is a straw-man argument put forward by opponents of reform). This is a key point that needs to be repeated about a billion times to counter the cynical propaganda of those who profit from the current broken non-system.
      • I would add “for a family of four” to the sentence “Insurance in populous states runs $15,000-$20,000 a year.”
      • One argument that is missing: Middle class families are being driven to financial ruin by medical bills. These are not flakey or reckless people. Most people who declare bankruptcy cite medical bills as a major cause, and most of them had so-called insurance when their health problems started.

      Hope this is helpful…
      Reply to this
      1. 1/24/2007 12:21 PM Montana Maven wrote:
        Thanks.  I made the changes.  It's due at 1PM.

        Reply to this

    Page: 1 of 1
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name (required)

     Email (will not be published) (required)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.



      

    Copyright . http://MONTANAMAVEN.COM. All rights reserved.